<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Windows Vista security broken?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://tips.vlaurie.com/2008/08/wndows-vista-security-broken/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://tips.vlaurie.com/2008/08/wndows-vista-security-broken/</link>
	<description>News, commentary and tips for safer and easier computing</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 16:48:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Vic Laurie</title>
		<link>http://tips.vlaurie.com/2008/08/wndows-vista-security-broken/comment-page-1/#comment-4828</link>
		<dc:creator>Vic Laurie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Aug 2008 00:45:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tips.vlaurie.com/?p=1940#comment-4828</guid>
		<description>I do not know enough to see what all the implications of this security breach might be. However, &lt;em&gt;if&lt;/em&gt; some of the comments that I have read are accurate, careful PC users are no less safe than than they have been all along. Some safety features of Vista can be breached but, according to some of the comments, UAC and protected mode in IE7 are still effective. I imagine more information will appear soon.

As far as Firefox and NoScript are concerned, I would think that this new problem does not apply.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I do not know enough to see what all the implications of this security breach might be. However, <em>if</em> some of the comments that I have read are accurate, careful PC users are no less safe than than they have been all along. Some safety features of Vista can be breached but, according to some of the comments, UAC and protected mode in IE7 are still effective. I imagine more information will appear soon.</p>
<p>As far as Firefox and NoScript are concerned, I would think that this new problem does not apply.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sol Libes</title>
		<link>http://tips.vlaurie.com/2008/08/wndows-vista-security-broken/comment-page-1/#comment-4827</link>
		<dc:creator>Sol Libes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Aug 2008 00:29:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tips.vlaurie.com/?p=1940#comment-4827</guid>
		<description>Thanks for pointing out this possible security problem.

If I use Firefox and with the NoScript add-on am I protected from this problem?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for pointing out this possible security problem.</p>
<p>If I use Firefox and with the NoScript add-on am I protected from this problem?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
