<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: No matter how powerful your machine, Vista won&#8217;t be any faster</title>
	<atom:link href="http://tips.vlaurie.com/2007/11/no-matter-how-powerful-your-machine-vista-wont-be-any-faster/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://tips.vlaurie.com/2007/11/no-matter-how-powerful-your-machine-vista-wont-be-any-faster/</link>
	<description>News, commentary and tips for safer and easier computing</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 00:15:10 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Windows Vista: Really no faster than XP? &#124; Vista Review</title>
		<link>http://tips.vlaurie.com/2007/11/no-matter-how-powerful-your-machine-vista-wont-be-any-faster/comment-page-1/#comment-4369</link>
		<dc:creator>Windows Vista: Really no faster than XP? &#124; Vista Review</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2007 20:27:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tips.vlaurie.com/2007/no-matter-how-powerful-your-machine-vista-wont-be-any-faster/#comment-4369</guid>
		<description>[...] When I read this article today about &#8220;Vista won&#8217;t be any faster, it got me thinking. You now, I have a dual-core processor laptop with 2GB of ram. It really got me thinking, 2GB of ram is more than I&#8217;ve ever had on any computer I&#8217;ve ever owned. I work on PC&#8217;s day and night, but previous to the laptop I never had a need to have more than 512MB of ram. I mean, of course I had a need, I just never spent the $$. So the laptop has 4 times the amount of ram that my previous system had - and the only difference is that the old laptop (and my old PC) was running Windows XP Professional. Well, that and the fact that the laptop has a &#8220;dual-core&#8221; processing, a significant improvement over a single core. Windows Vista was supposed to be so much more &#8220;responsive&#8221;, and make my life so much easier. I&#8217;ve realized today that it&#8217;s just as slow as both XP systems. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] When I read this article today about &#8220;Vista won&#8217;t be any faster, it got me thinking. You now, I have a dual-core processor laptop with 2GB of ram. It really got me thinking, 2GB of ram is more than I&#8217;ve ever had on any computer I&#8217;ve ever owned. I work on PC&#8217;s day and night, but previous to the laptop I never had a need to have more than 512MB of ram. I mean, of course I had a need, I just never spent the $$. So the laptop has 4 times the amount of ram that my previous system had &#8211; and the only difference is that the old laptop (and my old PC) was running Windows XP Professional. Well, that and the fact that the laptop has a &#8220;dual-core&#8221; processing, a significant improvement over a single core. Windows Vista was supposed to be so much more &#8220;responsive&#8221;, and make my life so much easier. I&#8217;ve realized today that it&#8217;s just as slow as both XP systems. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Windows Vista News</title>
		<link>http://tips.vlaurie.com/2007/11/no-matter-how-powerful-your-machine-vista-wont-be-any-faster/comment-page-1/#comment-4361</link>
		<dc:creator>Windows Vista News</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2007 20:00:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tips.vlaurie.com/2007/no-matter-how-powerful-your-machine-vista-wont-be-any-faster/#comment-4361</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;No matter how powerful your machine, Vista won&#8217;t be any faster...&lt;/strong&gt;

Interesting point at tips.vlaurie.com...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>No matter how powerful your machine, Vista won&#8217;t be any faster&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Interesting point at tips.vlaurie.com&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
