PC World has more on what went on at the conference in Tunisia that dealt with the question of Internet governance. It seems that how you interpret the results depends on who you are.
Both the U.S. and the European Union are claiming victory in an agreement reached over Internet governance, viewed as one of the most contentious issues being debated at the World Summit on the Information Society (WSIS) here this week.
The only problem is, both parties still remain at the opposite ends of the Internet governance debate. While the U.S. interprets the agreement to give it continued control over the Internet’s core components, including its addressing systems, the E.U. reads it to open the door for Internet oversight to be shared by governments of the world.
As much as we might wish to continue US supervision of the Internet, it seems clear that sooner or later other countries are going to want a bigger role in something as internationally significant as the Internet. I just hope that our government will have enough diplomatic savvy to satisfy the inevitable pressure for participation by other countries while countering the move to censorship and other undesirable aspects of control that are bound to come from many countries. As China has shown, governments can put censorship in place whether we like it or not, but let us at least try to keep the basic structure and governance of the Internet as free as possible from political and religious strictures.
Unfortunately, I am not very sanguine about the long-term prospects. The diplomatic clumsiness of the current administration in Washington and the ugly trends at work in the world are not promising.